This study expanded on these findings and examined whether 6 neuropsychological tests could be used to detect malingering in litigant (n = 55) and … Slick, Sherman, and Iverson (1999) claimed that the pattern of performance method (PPM) is probably the most effective way to detect malingering with standard neuropsychological evaluations. The standardization of neuropsychological tests allows for comparability across test administrations. There are no pure tests for “malingering” and no test has a 100% “hit” rate for detecting it. The original MND Criterion B, evidence from neuropsychological testing, included six different elements that could contribute to the determination of MND. Tests are used for research into brain function and in a clinical setting for the diagnosis of deficits. Neuropsychological tests are specifically designed tasks that are used to measure a psychological function known to be linked to a particular brain structure or pathway. Participants completed two malingering measures. Records of 105 patients referred for neuropsychological evaluation, who completed the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), Reliable Digit Span (RDS), and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III), were examined. Few studies to date have cross-validated indicators of malingering that have been suggested on various neuropsychological tests. neuropsychological tests. The original Criterion C, evidence based on self-report, included an additional five elements, for a total of 11 different elements to consider in making a determination of malingering. The WMT is a computer-administered memory task designed to detect malingering and has been described as being a valid indicator of biased responding on neuropsychological tests (Iverson, Green, & Gervais, 1999). This study presents data cross-validating several indicators of malingering on neuropsychological tests, as well as on tests of malingering and via behavioral observations. They usually involve the systematic administration of clearly defined procedures in a formal environment. The Validity checks into neuropsychological tests have been successful at detecting malingering in litigant patients with mild brain injury in recent years. View PAR's assortment of these tests here. Abstract. Feigning and malingering assessments can help you easily determine the validity of an individual's responses. Therefore, it has been important to consider the specificity and sensitivity of neuropsychological tests, as well as how some patients may demonstrate “malingering” during testing. Neuropsychological tests assessing cognitive, motor, sensory, or behavioral abilities require actual performance of tasks, and they provide quantitative assessments of an individual’s functioning within and across cognitive domains. There is variability between effort tests for sensitivity and specificity as well. The Word Memory Test (WMT) was administered first ( Green, Allen, & Astner, 1997). It is unclear whether symptom validity test (SVT) failure in neuropsychological and psychiatric domains overlaps. Neuropsychological testing can help with diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation planning. What can neuropsychological evaluation say about honesty, exaggeration, effort, and malingering? Results indicated that subjects' pattern of neuropsychological performance was not a reliable indicator of malingering performance, supporting the notion that specialized malingering tests are a critically necessary component to clinical classification of malingering. tests actually measure a patient’s effort in particular circumstances whether measured directly or embedded within another test of performance. The assessment of malingering has been approached in many ways.